Ulmefoorum.eu

rincewind · Postitatud: Nelj Aug 24, 2006 9:42 pm Teema:

Kriteeriumid esemete või nähtuste liigitamiseks on ju kõik kunstlikud. Füüsika seadused ei ütle , et Pluuto ON planeet, seda ütlesid need samad teadlased (või nende eelkäijad ). Piiri all ma pidasin silmas, et tuleb määrata kindlad parameetrid klassifitseerimiseks - suurus , orbiit, atmosfäär, kaaslased etc.. Ja kui Pluuto või mingi muu taevakeha ei vasta neile (kunstlikele) tingimustele, siis ega ta sellepärast Oorti pilve pagendusse pea minema.
_________________
Pettumus on lootuse nukker lapsuke.-S.Vititski-

Enterprise · Postitatud: Reede Aug 25, 2006 12:33 pm Teema:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/5283956.stm

NASA teadlane ajab õiget juttu.
_________________
Administraator

It changed the future, and it changed us. It taught us that we had to create the future, or others will do it for us. It showed us that we have to care for each other, because if we don't, who will? And that strength sometimes comes from the most unlikely of places. Mostly, though, I think it gave us hope that there can always be new beginnings, even for people like us.

Enterprise · Postitatud: Nelj Sept 14, 2006 4:36 pm Teema:

Astronoomid andsid kääbusplaneedile tülijumalanna nime

http://live.hot.ee/aggregator/etv24/564768

How fitting...
_________________
Administraator

It changed the future, and it changed us. It taught us that we had to create the future, or others will do it for us. It showed us that we have to care for each other, because if we don't, who will? And that strength sometimes comes from the most unlikely of places. Mostly, though, I think it gave us hope that there can always be new beginnings, even for people like us.